Former Mr Fluffy blocks
Often already carrying a two-dwelling lease — which can remove the charge entirely.
Between the 1960s and 1979, loose-fill asbestos insulation was installed in around a thousand Canberra homes. Under the Loose Fill Asbestos Insulation Eradication Scheme the Territory bought back the affected properties, demolished the houses and resold the blocks.
There are two lists, and they mean different things:
| List | Size | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| List of affected properties | ~1,029 | Ever affected. Almost all demolished and rebuilt. This is the commercially interesting one. |
| Affected Residential Premises Register | A few dozen | Currently affected and still standing. A live hazard. |
Why the full list matters to a developer
When the Territory resold these blocks, many were released with a Crown lease whose purpose clause already permits two dwellings. If that is true of the block you are looking at, going to two dwellings adds no dwellings to the lease — and no Schedule 2 charge arises at all. On a Chapman block that is $83,250 you do not pay; in O'Connor it is $206,750.
It is also worth knowing that these blocks are disproportionately in the older, inner suburbs where the LVC rates are highest, which is exactly where the saving is largest.
What MPA 04 changed
Former Mr Fluffy blocks used to enjoy a lower minimum block size for dual occupancy in RZ1 — 700 m² rather than 800 m². Since 1 July 2026, minimum block sizes for additional dwellings in RZ1 have been removed altogether, so that particular advantage no longer distinguishes them. The two-dwelling lease still does.
The one thing you must do
Read the lease. This tool can tell you a block appears on the list; it cannot read the purpose clause, and the clause is what determines the charge. Order the Crown lease from ACTLIS and read it before you assume anything — then set "dwellings the lease already permits" to 2 on the property page and see what it does to the numbers.
Last reviewed 1 August 2026. Every figure here should be verified against the current instrument — see sources and method.
Other explainers
- Residual land value
- Why unimproved value is your floor
- The 75% rule, and the missing middle remission
- The density curve
- The $1.28 rule
- Time is a cost
- Why “DA approved” may be worth nothing
- Reading a Crown lease purpose clause
- What MPA 04 changed on 1 July 2026
- The Pattern Book
- Buyer incentives from 1 July 2026